Showing posts with label Elections 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elections 2011. Show all posts

Friday, 6 May 2011

Election Results & Today's Plan

I'm sure everyone has read about the Labour landslide victory last night at the election results already, but just in case you've missed it, here's a list of all duly elected members of the council.

Also, I'll be doing a radio interview later on today with StaffsLive at around 3pm.

And later on as part of my StokeElect2011 coverage, I'll be doing some statistics crunching.

AND hopefully I'll be updating with AV results along the way!

Here are the Stoke-on-Trent City Council election results by ward:

Labour 34
Independent 7
Conservative 2
Unaffiliated 1

WardsElected CandidatesElected Party or Parties
Abbey Hulton and TownsendCouncillor Gwen HassallPolitical party colour Labour
Councillor Adrian KnapperPolitical party colour Labour
Baddeley, Milton and NortonJack BreretonPolitical party colour Conservative Party
Andy LilleyPolitical party colour Labour
Councillor Duncan WalkerPolitical party colour Labour
Bentilee and UbberleySheila PittPolitical party colour Labour
Alison Ruth WedgwoodPolitical party colour Labour
Birches Head and Central Forest ParkPaul Derrick BreezePolitical party colour unaffiliated
Mark Joseph MeredithPolitical party colour Labour
Blurton EastGlenys WardPolitical party colour Independent
Blurton West and NewsteadNeil Douglas DayPolitical party colour Labour
Boothen and OakhillAndy PlattPolitical party colour Labour
Bradeley and Chell HeathGurmeet Singh KallarPolitical party colour Labour
Broadway and Longton EastCouncillor Tom ReynoldsPolitical party colour Labour
Burslem CentralAlan Edward DuttonPolitical party colour Labour
Burslem ParkCouncillor Joy GarnerPolitical party colour Labour
Dresden and FlorenceShazad HussainPolitical party colour Labour
Eaton ParkTerry CrowePolitical party colour Labour
Etruria and HanleyCouncillor Majid KhanPolitical party colour Labour
Fenton EastCouncillor Paul ShottonPolitical party colour Labour
Fenton West and Mount PleasantKaren Christine ClarkePolitical party colour Labour
Ford Green and SmallthorneCouncillor Matt WilcoxPolitical party colour Labour
Goldenhill and SandyfordMartin GarnerPolitical party colour Labour
Great Chell and PackmoorCouncillor Janine BridgesPolitical party colour Labour
Ann JamesPolitical party colour Independent
Hanford and TrenthamCouncillor Terence FollowsPolitical party colour Independent
Peter Frederick HaywardPolitical party colour Independent
Hanley Park and SheltonCouncillor Amjid WazirPolitical party colour Labour
Hartshill and BasfordShaun Patrick PenderPolitical party colour Labour
Hollybush and Longton WestKathleen Mary BanksPolitical party colour Labour
Joiners SquareAlastair Scott WatsonPolitical party colour Labour
Lightwood North and NormacotCouncillor Bagh AliPolitical party colour Labour
Little Chell and StanfieldCouncillor David ConwayPolitical party colour Independent
Meir HayMuhammad AumirPolitical party colour Labour
Meir NorthCouncillor Ruth RosenauPolitical party colour Labour
Meir ParkCouncillor Abi BrownPolitical party colour Conservative Party
Meir SouthDeborah Ann WheeldonPolitical party colour Labour
MoorcroftCouncillor Mohammed PervezPolitical party colour Labour
Penkhull and StokeCouncillor Randolph ContehPolitical party colour Independent
Sandford HillCouncillor Olwen HamerPolitical party colour Labour
Sneyd GreenCouncillor Debra GrattonPolitical party colour Labour
Springfields and Trent ValeCouncillor Sarah HillPolitical party colour Labour
TunstallLee WangerPolitical party colour Independent
Weston CoyneyMatthew Thomas FryPolitical party colour Labour

Thursday, 5 May 2011

Election Fever or Flop?

It's not only the weather that's giving me mixed messages today. I've found it very hard to gauge the general atmosphere towards the elections today...

I woke up to a grey sky and switched onto BBC Breakfast to be told about fruit orchards and some new films and TV dramas. I checked my twitter feed, and by 10ish it sounded like Polling Stations across the country had been very empty. Nevertheless, the sun was trying to break through the clouds and I made my commute to work.

In the office, there was zero mention of local elections or the referendum all day.

By the time I was commuting home it had rained and it wasn't only the atmosphere in the clouds which changed. My twitter feed was tweeting tweets suggesting attendance at polling stations was on the up. It didn't seem so at my local station as I walked past though.

Then it chucked it down around half 5 in the afternoon. As soon as the rain cleared, I thought I'd go have a look at my station again, and to my surprise there was a small queue inside and a fairly steady flow of voters young and old trickling in and out the station like the summer rain trickling off the nearby leaves.

Now, I wait anxiously like many others in Stoke-on-Trent to see if it tongiht will bring us 'shephard's delight' or a heavy thuderstorm...

Saturday, 16 April 2011

SoT Council Elections - The last 15 years of confusion

Hello all,

As I've mentioned before, I'm not a Stokie and only moved here recently. It didn't take me long to pick up the political hype of the area and it's got me hooked. Because I'm analysing the May 2011 elections - I thought it best to research a brief history of Council elections and get to grips with the system in place here.

What a headache that's caused me!
I'm writing this post to summarise my findings for the changes implemented in the last 15 years. I've also been looking more at specific ward results over the years, but this post is just about the election/councillor/wards systems.

I've used legislation.gov to find most of this information out and a bit of brain-power to work things out. If I've got something wrong, please tell me!

1995
The big reform of the Stoke-on-Trent local government system happened in 1995 when the 'Staffordshire (City of Stoke-on-Trent) (Structural and Boundary Changes) Order' was enacted.
It meant that Stoke-on-Trent would become a county in its own right and not be part of Staffordshire (in a legal sense) any long
er. This would mean a transfer of most responsibilities (excluding the police for example) to Stoke-on-Trent City Council.

This would all happen in reality on April 1 1997.
In 1996, elections would be held to elect a completely new set of councillors (although I believe they could stand to be elected again? Will be checking it out at the City Archives)

These 60 Councillors across 20 wards would then hold elections every year for one-third of the Council. In practice, it meant that the councillor in each ward with the lowest number of votes in 1996 would have their place put up for election (they could stand again for re-election) in 1998 - after two years of service.

In 1999, the councillor with the second lowest votes from back in 1996 would have their seat contested again.
And in 2000, the original most voted-for candidate in 1996 would have their seat contested.

I've put those words
into a table to make things a bit clearer on screen...
Councillor A received the most votes, B the second and C the least of the three.









As you can see, after four years, a whole new selection of councillors is possible. But remember, councillors could stand for re-election. So 'D' could in fact be 'C' for example.

2001
By this point, the previous system had proved effective in that there was no major malfunctions in the system. However, The City of Stoke-on-Trent (Electoral Changes) Order 2001 made a slight alteration as well as a few boundary shifts.

It also meant the system would restart with a whole new Council (an 'all-out' election')

The pattern would now be that there would be no two-year grace period for all three councillors and the least successful of the three would ha
ve their seat contested after 1 year.
To keep the 4-year term rule going, this would mean no election further down the time-frame as follows...







This all followed in reality with the lack of election in 2009 (mirroring 2005 because of the 4-year rule).

2009
By 2009, many had grown tired of voting every year for just one councillor. The City of Stoke-on-Trent (Scheme of Elections) Order 2009 is a very small piece of legislation which makes a big difference.

From 2011 (this election!) the "election every year by thirds" system would be abolished in favour for four-yearly all-out elections. A much simpler way of selecting a Council. As with the previous reforms, all current councillors lose their seat in may but may stand again.

2011
The Stoke-on-Trent (Electoral Changes) Order 2011 made the final update to the rules just in time for the May election. The Order changed the boundaries and number of councillors electable to each ward - the changes I'm sure you're all familiar with as they have been the subject of much media and political coverage in the local area.

Read the orders for yourself here: http://bit.ly/gmXpDT

So there you have a brief guide to how Stoke-on-Trent has had its elections for the last 15 years. Who knows how we'll be voting in 15 more to come?




Saturday, 9 April 2011

How much are the Big 3 in London thinking about local elections?

With local elections following almost a year on from the formation of the Coalition government on a national scale, just how important are the local elections of councillors to the big 3 in London?

Many newspapers and political commentators are suggesting this will be a big test in the confidence of the coalition government and an early indication as to how far Labour has come in its big recovery since losing power.

The key factor I keep in mind however is the fact that these are local ward elections and not MP elections. Voters aren't voting on a local to national stage but on a very local stage which will (in my opinion) affect the way a lot of people approach voting. It certainly does for me.

"Local elections in England are due to take place on 5 May 2011 in:
36 Metropolitan Boroughs in England – all by thirds
49 Unitary authorities in England – 19 by thirds and 30 all-up (including Stoke-on-Trent)
194 Second-tier districts in England– 70 by thirds and 124 all-up
26 district councils in Northern Ireland – all-up
Elections to the National Assembly for Wales, Scottish Parliament and Northern Ireland
Assembly will also take place on 5 May 2011.
The Government intends for these elections to be held alongside a referendum on voting
reform, in order to minimise the number of occasions on which people are asked to vote."




Now I won't get out a calculator and them all up but that looks like a lot of councillors and elections to me!

So how important is the local election to the big national party?

With under a month to go till voting begins you'd expect some sort of coverage on the parties' websites so I had a look (in alphabetical order to show no bias of course!). As much as the subject enthuses me, I haven't all the time in the world to devote to StokeElect2011 so I've done this based solely on the home pages and direct links from the home page's articles etc.

Conservatives
The main headline of the Conservative party's website (April 9 at 1300) is (and in rather large font) 'CONSERVATIVES CONTEST 94% OF LOCAL ELECTION SEATS' with a big arrow leading to this article (click here) explaining how the Conservatives are dominating the field in local elections nationally with a nice picture of Minister Warsi looking informed and quotes from her regarding the elections in the article.

Good effort I'd say!

Labour
The Labour page only really contains one clue they're thinking about the local elections - the 'Your Voice' section at the top of the home page. You find a small paragraph confirming that Labour Councillors will be standing against coalition cuts and a 2 minute video of Ed Milliband reflecting on his school days, his Dad (you can see the family resemblance!) and talking to all sorts of people around the country. (Watch it on youtube here) It bigs up the power of the people but doesn't actually refer to local elections in any way. This gives the Labour webpage the overall impression that the elections are happening but there is no huge effort on a national level to address them.


Liberal Democrats
The first thing you notice about the Lib Dem home page is that it contains a lot more in a lot less space. Their homepage is a little more interactive with a rotating news bar at the top containing 5 lead stories - two of which refer to the AV vote system and how to join the campaign for fairer votes. There's nothing to do with local elections or councillors to be easily seen though.

Despite this, the Lib Dems are the only party who have a whole website dedicated to Stoke-on-Trent rather than a particular MP or campaign in Stoke-on-Trent. Or at least this is how it appears if you type 'Conservatives Stoke', 'Labour Stoke' and 'Lib Dems Stoke' into google.

Overall
Overall I think it's safe to say the Conservatives have clearly taken the lead when it comes to their home page reflecting local elections as a high priority. Interestingly enough, and I try to remain a political commentator only, the Conservatives point out in their article linked above that Labour has failed to field a candidate in nearly 30% of seats nationally - despite their big comeback.

But the question at the end of the day is how much does it matter?
Are voters in local elections swayed by what they read and hear about 'Party X' in the news every day on a national scale or do people shut that all away and focus on which individuals they want running their local Council?

What do you think? Comments are free below with no need to register.
Also, this article only looks at one teeny aspect of the Big 3 in London - their websites.
Other factors contribute to their attitude and portrayal to the public of course!

Location of Polling Stations

If you're not sure if your local polling station in Stoke-on-Trent has moved with the ward boundary changes this year, take a look at this .pdf document produced by the council.

It is the bottom file under the list: Related Files

Click here to follow the link!

Unfortunately it isn't ordered in a very reader-friendly way and includes rather confusing codes referring to 'descriptions of persons entitled to vote'.

Also it is not clear which of the new wards (or the previous wards) each polling station represents -especially confusing for someone who hasn't voted in Stoke-on-Trent before.

Hopefully a more understandable source will become available or more information delivered direct to the public.

Nevertheless, a good source if you want to check where the action will be (as long as you are familiar with Stoke-on-Trent geography!)

Friday, 8 April 2011

New Wards - Maps & Demographics











Follow this link here to have a nose at some demographic detail of your local ward.

City Council Ward Demographic Pages

The Stoke-on-Trent City Council website is hard to navigate a lot of the time (in my opinion) but there are some real gems to be found inside.

The link above takes you to a rather empty looking page but in fact the list on the right can take you on to view .pdf files containing the following based on data collected by the Council:

Household estimates
Population (incl. Male/Female) estimates
Age category population breakdown estimates
Household Income averages (incl. % with <£10k and >£50k)
Index of deprivation
Employment %s
Ethnicity
And socio-demographics (in other words what type of people live in which types of houses)

Fantastic for researching your local area and the sorts of people living in it.

Especially good for election candidates in understanding their areas more.

Welcome

Welcome to the blog extension of the @StokeElect2011 twitter account.

Here you'll find some extra bits and pieces from around the web as well as any material I create myself regarding the upcoming elections on May 5 2011.

Stoke-on-Trent citizens will be taking to the poll booths to vote not only on the national UK referendum about the adoption of Alternative Vote but also to elect an entire new array of councillors to the City Council.

To mix things up even more this May, ward boundaries and councillor numbers have changed resulting in a drop of total councillors but an increase in the number of wards. The result of this: smaller wards with independent councillors to represent.

There are exceptions - with 5 wards keeping the traditional two-councillor election and 1 ward having a three-councillor election.